FooD for ThoughT
March 22, 2006
What’s the first thing that springs to mind when I say : FOOD?A plate of pleasure with guilt to follow has some insights.
“Guilt about the pleasure of eating is nothing new, and if diet gurus sound almost evangelical, there’s a very good reason for it.
..although cloaked in the language of science and nutrition, prevailing Western preoccupations with diet, self-control and the body stretch back…to antiquity.
Clearly people find pleasure in eating foods, but pleasure challenges self-control, and pleasure has a long history in our culture of being highly problematic because it challenges reason and logic – what you’re doing is caving in to bodily and hedonistic senses.”
Let’s face it. Food = Pleasure (at least for most people I know, or at least the ones willing to admit it..Heh)
Do you eat for “pleasure” or just for its dietary benefit. (Yea…Rrrrrright..Heh)
The pleasure of food is the sensation of well-being that derives from the fulfillment of a basic natural instinct.
What many don’t realize is that the pleasure we get from food is not only physical sensation, but emotional and psychological as well.
But..What to eat?
Bland rice cake or rich, decadent brownie?
Cholesterol
Fat
Pesticides
Sugar
Salt
Do you monitor the content or gobble down the gummie bears?
Do you consume more if the food is attractively presented?
Do you appreciate food for its its “ritualistic value”…dinner with the family at 6.
Is the only food you can eat without guilt a celery stalk or carrot stick?
Do ya feel “deprived” if you don’t have your “favorite” dish or dessert?
Some find the ultimate pleasure in eating the creations of a well-known chef, whereas others enjoy the emotions associated with a “home cooked meal” by a loved one.
Historically, food has also been a way to cope with stress…Ice-cream anyone?
Try as we may to avoid it, so much of our social life revolves around food.
So g’head, indulge that appetite, but don’t forget to give thanks to the One who gave you the glory of this simple pleasure.
ConsideR the CensoR
February 7, 2006
Cartoons which ‘offend’ may be the least of our problems when it comes to the “censorship” debate.
We are currently drowning in a tsunami of amorality. The adherence to traditional morality is long gone,and people fear Legislation in this arena more than they do societal ramifications and the consequences of a complete cultural breakdown.
In his book, “Slouching Towards Gomorrah”- Robert Bork states:”..ours is “a degenerate society,” “enfeebled, hedonistic,” “subpagan,” and headed for “ultimate degradation” in “the coming of a new Dark Ages.”
He suggests “law based on morality”and believed that society may properly set limits on “what may be shown said and sung.” One of his pivotal chapters is titled “The Case for Censorship.”
“Without censorship, it has proved impossible to maintain any standards of decency.“(p.117)
The music industry has transitioned from celebrating wholesome songwriters and musicians to sexualizing young girls at the earliest possible age and unapologetically celebrating wanton sex.
Much of what passes for rock music celebrates nihilism and perversion.
Rappers oftentimes glorify criminal behavoir as gangsta and macho,while the half naked girls and women are relegated to writhe and slither around them and the stage.
Critics are oftentimes accused of bigotry if they intimate that this is destructive to popular culture. It would thus seem then that you think misogyny and violence are what define the average black male and hypersexual narcissim – the average black girl and woman.
Lyrics are inundated with curse words and have been so deeply ingrained that it is taken completely for granted.
Films which promote the purposeful degradation of morality are monumental successes -
Sadistic violence, homoerotic behavior and anything which promotes unbridled hedonism.
Televison ads overwhelmingly target children and adolescents, who are estimated to watch more than 40,000 television commercials per year.
“Because younger children do not understand persuasive intent in advertising, they are easy targets for commercial persuasion,” said psychologist Brian Wilcox, Ph.D., Professor of Psychology and Director of the Center on Children, Families and the Law at the University of Nebraska and chair of the task force.”
American Psychological Association
Turning off televsions, limiting children’s access to the Internet,trying to monitor music which is downloaded are solutions touted but as we all know……There are video screens in malls everywhere, in waiting room offices, billboards are thrust in our faces, magazine stands display what could pass for pornography on city streets.
Perhaps you should consider the state or federal government’s responsibilty in this after all.
The all powerful judiciary should be reined in.
It is every individual’s moral obligation to force the government’s hand with respect to the judiciary, which has all but removed the ability of individual communities to set social standards- specifically against pornography.
Some degree of censorship may frighten many-
but if the alternative is allowing the current decadent, secularist trend to keep diluting and destroying every known value our Country was founded upon…
We may just find ourselves in a place where even censorship may no be a possible strategy:
Moral Oblivion.
LearN EnglisH
February 7, 2006
There’s a reason it is called “illegal” immigration..because um..it’s not legal.
Yet again we see liberals playing ethnic politics.
Eleazar Paula Mendez is charged with killing her three children. We are now being told that she was “depressed” but in her adopted hometown in Arkansas there were no mental-health professionals who speak Spanish.
Yahoo News
“Arkansas had the second-fastest growing Hispanic population in the 1990s, according to Census figures, but many communities have limited social services catering to them.
In De Queen — which is 50 percent Hispanic — the largest mental-health clinic relies on an interpreter.”
“Some immigrants may be nervous about talking about their problems to an outsider if they entered the country illegally, said the priest, Marquez-Munoz.”
Entered the country ILLEGALLY being the operative term here.
I am not commenting on the status of Ms. Mendez, but the Priest who counselled Mr.Mendez is making this point.
These ‘immigrants’ need mental health services.. “And emotions and nuances are lost in translation..It’s like trying to watch a movie that has been dubbed,” Marquez-Munoz said.
Some of us have been saying this all along:
Multiculturalism is dangerous to our Nation.
We clearly see now that it is equally dangerous to the immigrants themselves as well as their children.
Ms.Mendez,is charged with capital murder in the deaths of Elvis, 7, and twins Samantha and Samuel, 5.
According the this report,the Mexican-born Mendez had lived in the United States about 11 years.
ELEVEN years…and reportedly her English was too poor to get the mental health counseling she allegedly needed?
“Her English is very limited,” the Rev. Salvador Marquez-Munoz said. “And who am I going to refer her to around here?”
Even President Clinton was in favor of immigrants learning English. We have said repeatedly : Immigrants must learn to acclimate to American culture and NOT visa versa.
Now there are three children gone- forever.We are sorrowful and mourn profoundly with the families.
But from what we are hearing…a simple English class could perhaps have -for them- spelled Life or Death.
ChildreN and paiN
February 7, 2006
When you check out the National Sex Offender Registry you are greeted with the following.
Protect your community.
Protect your family.
Protect yourself.
National Sex Offender Registry
Then you have the luxury and wonderful priviledge of finding men, living in your community-perhaps next door to you- who have raped, repeatedly molested and tortured little girls, boys, and women.
This is how our government ahem…”protects” us and our children?
“The FBI’s Crimes Against Children Unit coordinates the development and implementation of the National Sex Offenders Registry (NSOR).
The Pam Lychner Sexual Offender Tracking and Identification Act of 1996 (Lychner Act), requires the Attorney General to establish a national database at the FBI to track the whereabouts and movements of certain convicted sex offenders under Title 42 of the United States Code Section 14072. The National Crime Information Center (NCIC) enables the NSOR to retain the offender’s current registered address and dates of registration, conviction, and residence.”
FBI
No one seems to think this incredulous.
“Tracking” whereabouts of men allowed to live FREELY in our neighborhoods?
There is statistical evidence which borders on irrefutable that rapists and child molesters who are virtually assured of release from prison are almost certain to commit their crimes again.
“A 1992 study of 767 rapists and child molesters in Minnesota found those who completed psychiatric treatment were arrested more often for new sex crimes than those who had not been treated at all. A Canadian survey that tracked released child molesters for 20 years revealed a 43 percent recidivism rate regardless of the therapy. The difference between those simply incarcerated and those subjected to a full range of treatments appears statistically negligible. And the more violent and sadistic the offense, the more likely it is to be repeated.”
Sex Predators Can’t be Saved
Let me repeat that: The more violent and sadistic the offense, the more likely it is to be repeated.”
Wouldn’t common sense simply dictate a law permitting indefinite confinement of sex offenders (or “sadists” which is what they truly are) deemed to be dangerous if released?
For mercys sake whatever happened to no-parole life sentences?
If you don’t believe there is a rampant, epidemic of sexual crime and violence, which is steadily increasing ..you are deluded.
While the government is urging people to stock up on bottled water and canned goods in the event of pandemic bird flu..they allow sexual sadists to create more and more victims.
What we need in order to protect ourselves and our precious children are not platitudes about alleged rehabilitation but tough, uncompromising penalties and consequences for sexual sadists be they viewed in the light of day or the dark of midnight.
It’s time to stop allowing sexual criminals to slither around amongst us.
It’s time for some serious housecleaning, including the dirty cracks and corners.
NOT IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD should be Law…not a wish, hope and a prayer of a mother or father of a precious little one.
ThreE QuestionS
February 7, 2006
My first question is this:
The Muzlim women, if thats what you can call these particular ones in Qum, (the second most sacred city in Iran) need a serious geography lesson.
Due to “sketches”, which were viewed as anti-Izlamic, women in Qum gathered around a holy place, a shrine and burned the Israeli flag.
O.K. am I missing something here?
The alleged offenders were Danish, and somehow yet again there is cause to burn the flag of Israel? If someone sees the logical deduction here. .please clue us all in.
In addition to the usual ranting, threatening and general barbaric responses- “Thousands of Syrians enraged by caricatures of Islam’s revered prophet torched the Danish and Norwegian embassies in Damascus on Saturday “… In Indonesia they stormed the Danish Embassy.
NY Times
Buildings were burned down over a perceived insult in a cartoon.
“In Gaza, Palestinians marched through the streets, storming European buildings and burning German and Danish flags. Protesters smashed the windows of the German cultural center and threw stones at the European Commission building..”
Hamas called the cartoons “an unforgivable insult” that merited punishment by death.
That’s right..they said Death.
Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany said she understood Muslims were hurt — though that did not justify violence.
Correct me if I’m mistaken , but isn’t that the very first lesson you teach your child in this life…Just because your feelings got hurt doesn’t mean you have a right to hit someone. Is that not the sole difference between a human who is cultured and civilized and a human who lives by raw nature and barbarian impulses?
Which brings me to my second question:
What are Muzlim leaders and average “so called innocent civilians” doing to dissociate their faith from these extreme and violent measures to which things are being taken by the terrorists? Do you see rallies, public protestations by Muzlim clerics and citizens with respect to this deplorable behavior in the Muzlim world? I don’t hear a peep.
Which leads me to my third question:
Iconoclastic expressions in America are generally condemned as being in bad taste. Despite this- there have been and are “so called artists” in America who create images deriding Christ. And as abhorrent as this is to most Americans – they do not burn down buildings or threaten to murder- in protest.Insulting and DerisorY material about women is so routine , it goes almost completely unnoticed.
This is not to say that this type of material should be remotely condoned…but one of the most
striking aspects of these recent events is the leverage of the Muzlim world, especially when there are perceived insults or “wounded feelings”.
Did you happen to notice that No One in AmericA will publish the ‘cartoons’. For those who did not view them on the Internet, it is being described and left to the imagination.
Why is that?
The Press won’t go near this one. Not even the self loathing N.Y. Times.
Not even the rags who will stoop to the lowest level and publish just about AnYthinG to get a good ‘story.”
Have they become sufficiently frightened?
It would seem that they have been served notice ..and they are complying.
While the aggrieved Muzlim “believers” call for executions, our country’s press is opting for censorship.
Pornography won’t get censored.
Ads which offend women won’t get censored.
Images which offend Christians or Jews won’t get censored.
But…..THIS ..the press has been intimidated enough to refuse to reproduce.
My third question is:
WHY?
The ACLU FumbleS AgaiN
February 7, 2006
Not sure if this story escaped y’all.
12-15-05 49ers Season Ticket Holders Challenge Pat-Down Policy at Monster Park
SAN FRANCISCO – Two San Francisco 49er season ticket holders are challenging the new pat-down policy implemented by the 49ers this season. The ACLU of Northern California is representing Dan Sheehan, a season ticket holder for more than thirty-five years, and his wife Kathleen, who say their right to privacy under the California Constitution is being violated. The suit was filed today in San Francisco Superior Court. The ACLU-NC is asking the court to rule that the pat-downs violate the California Constitution.
No Pat Downs for the ACLU
In case you were not aware.. the pat-down policy was implemented this season in response to a directive from the NFL, citing post-September 11th security concerns.
This particular fan sees it otherwise.
“.. But this year, my family and I have been forced to submit to pat-downs by complete strangers that run their hands over my back, arms, waist and the outside of my legs. I find it terribly offensive that my family and I now have to be subjected to this because of some unknown fear…”
Did he say UNKNOWN fear?..Is this a cave-dweller?..Ask any 6 year old and they can tell you the very clear and present fear and danger.
He finds it “offensive“?.Well excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuse meeeeeeeee!!.Did that become the new buzz word while I wasn’t looking?..and since when does our government risk National Security due to someone taking offense?
Alright ..here’s the real gem:
“Why should thousands of fans be forced to allow a stranger to frisk them based on nothing more than pure speculation that football games might be a target?” said Ann Brick, ACLU-NC staff attorney. “Giving in to that way of thinking erodes the basic fabric of our free society and our constitutional right to privacy without making us any safer”.
Ahem..did she just say “pure speculation”?..Stadiums, where thousands gather are by their own admission- terrorist’s targets. Last time I checked -that’s called a FACT.
and let’s see now…”Patting someone” to ensure that he or she has no suicide belt slapped on is “eroding the basic fabric of our free society”????
Yes,I can see how this “ahem”..case would be the bread and butter of the ACLU attack dogs.
In their solipsistic little dream world there is no need to take precautions..most assuredly if Heaven forfend it may “offend” someone.
Sorry buddy, if you ask me :No Touchdowns without Pat downs.
BrotheR on BrotheR
February 7, 2006
My heart hurts too much to even post about this.
Israel – Acting( and that should be taken quite literally) Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has implemented Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank.
WorldNetDaily Protestors Brutalized
“Horse-mounted police, water cannons and specially trained riot officers faced off against hundreds of protesters who massed in Amona in hopes of halting the demolitions. Israeli television broadcast live footage of demonstrators, including women and children, being dragged and beaten by soldiers. Teenagers with bloody noses and head wounds were seen being removed from the scene. Police were shown using batons and gas canisters to clear the area of demonstrators.”
If you have the stomach to view the video, you’d swear you were watching a clip from the Middle Ages – horses , pulling girls by the hair, the repeated clubbing of young people on the skull…..And for what?…Oh, yes…giving up the “West Bank”.
What is the “West Bank”?
The West Bank is considered landlocked territory not officially recognized as part of any country. Israel calls the land “disputed.” The United Nations (a.k.a. The Largest Sanctioned Anti-Semite Club in the World) claims the West Bank is “occupied” by Israel.(is that what we now call lands which we acquired in a war that was waged AGAINST us??) Israel maintains overall control of most of the area while the Palestinian Authority( a.k.a. Terrorists, Suicide bombers etc.) has jurisdiction in about 40 percent.
The territory remained under Jordanian rule from 1948 until Israel captured the West Bank in 1967 (um..after they were ATTACKED by the invading Arabz) after Jordan’s King Hussein ignored Israeli pleas for his country to stay out of the Six Day War. Most countries rejected Jordan’s initial claim on the area, which it formally renounced in 1988.
“The West Bank borders most of Israel’s major cities, including Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Military strategists long have estimated Israel must maintain the West Bank to defend its borders from any ground invasion.”(a miniscule detail that Ehud Olmert conveniently forgot just prior to launching his Kadima Party’s political campaign after official installation last month as party chairman..interesting timing wouldn’t you say?)
Many villages in the West Bank, which Israelis commonly refer to as the “biblical heartland,” are mentioned throughout the Old Testament.”
And all this in the name of APPEASEMENT and a delusional hope for PEACE with a sworn enemy who has repeatedly said “Israel has NO right to exist.”
So let’s see…we take them on their word that if Israel hands over pieces of the tiny country a little at a time…they will finally stop bombing civilians…
But we don’t believe them when they say they will not rest until they drive Israel and all the Jews into the Meditteranean?
If someone understands that kind of logic..Please clue us all in.
Who’s PeepiN who?
February 7, 2006
While humming “Secret Agent Man”……..(sorry couldn’t help myself..heh)
“After the New York Times revealed Dec. 16 that the National Security Agency was monitoring telephone calls from suspected terrorists abroad to people in the United States, a hue and cry went up from the mainstream media and some Democrats that the Bush administration was engaged in a massive and illegitimate program of domestic wiretapping. Never mind that few if any wires were tapped — it’s likely that most of these calls were on cell phones — and that every one of the calls was by definition international.”
Chicago Sun Times
Surely even the PC dominated. left wing radical groups wouldn’t oppose the President and government utilizing surveillance of enemy communications in times of WaR?
or would they?
At one point would they consider their lives in peril enough to justify NSA surveillance..NeveR?
If someone (who may have already threatened,attacked or murdered a loved one of yours)..is on the loose-perhaps in your very own backyard…would you sanction law enforcement to consider his race, sex, ethnicity or any other specific identification? or does the entire neighborhood get the same ‘treatment’ as the criminal (or terror) suspect?
Does someone who then meets this criteria get investigated more vigorously than someone who has not one characteristic of the perp?
The Government is looking for Is-lamic terrorists…should I say it again?..spell it?..sing it?
They are not interested in eavesdropping on your grandmother’s Christmas fruitcake recipe ( tho it may be quite um…enlightening?..heh)
They are in quest of members of a radical death squad who are responsible for: (among a myriad of others)
Killing 243 Marines in Beirut in 1983.
Killing 270 innocent people on Pan Am fight 103 in 1988
Bombing the World Trade Center in 1993.
Bombing American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1997
Bombing US military barracks in Saudi Arabia in 1995
Bombing the USS Cole in 2000
the underground stations in London
the trains in Spain
and on and on and on…………..(apologies to the victims not mentioned)
SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 Waging War against the United States of America.
Terrorism Worldwide
These are undeniable facts about those who declared their intentions against both America and Israel.
When the government tried to undermine the mob, do you think they looked for red headed Irishmen or Italians?
Liberals are pushing us to excercise excessive caution at this time.
Do they think themselves impervious to bombs?..to nuclear weapons?…to death?
What is their high volume whining about surveillance all about ..
What do they truly fear? It’s time they come clean.
Hmmm..Makes one wonder..Is there something about grandma’s fruitcake we ought to know about?
OscaR the GroucH maybe
February 7, 2006
OK…not that it should even matter ..but…
The latest Oscar nomination buzz.
6 out of 15 acting nominations yesterday went for playing homosexual,transsexual characters, or the heterosexuals who of course -love them.
So leftist Hollywood doesn’t have an agenda eh?
Hmmmmm.
Any thoughts?